Mitsubishi 20-L Specifications Page 10

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 43
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 9
10
Dec. 20
Mitsubishi IPM-series Application Note
Reliability
7.Reliability
7-1. Introduction
It has only been somewhat over 30 years since
semiconductor devices such as rectifier diodes,
thyristors, and transistors gained widespread
acceptance for use in industrial machinery and
consumer appliances, but during that period the
reliability standards for these devices have made rapid
advances.
In equipment where high reliability is a must, failure
rate of the semiconductor devices must range from 10 to
100 FIT (1 FIT=10
-9
/hours). Of course, to achieve such
reliability in the equipment itself, not only must each
individual device be reliable, but also it is also extremely
important to match the specific characteristics of the
device with its application within the piece of equipment.
In fact, information obtained in field studies show that for
semiconductor devices manufactured using identical
procedures, failure rates in the field could vary by a
factor of 10 depending simply on how the device was
used.
The following information covers device reliability with
regards to how a device is used. An introductory
discussion is also presented on quality-control
procedures, and some examples of reliability testing
data are given.
7-2. Basic Concepts of Semiconductor Device
Reliability
7-2-1. Semiconductor Device Failure Rate Varied with The Lapse of Time
The failure rate of devices used in an average piece of equipment can be expressed by using the bathtub curve shown in Fig.7.1,
line (a). Taken from the standpoint of time, device failures can be classified as an early failure, random failure and wear out failure
period.Three points must be considered regarding the service life of a device; early and random failures rate, and lifetime before
wear out.
But the failure rate of semiconductors is illustrated by line (b) in the graph, where failure rate is shown to gradually diminish as a
factor of time. In other words, a notable feature of semiconductor devices is that the longer a particular device has been used, the
more stable it will be. Viewed from a different perspective, even though random failure rate has been reduced to virtual stability,
the failure distribution pattern shows early failures to still be prevalent. As shown by Fig.7.2 where failure rate versus time is given
for an actual device, the highest failure rate occurs immediately after manufacture, but the process of ageing and debugging
gradually lowers this failure rate.
The next step is with the user, who assembles, adjusts, and takes the device aging. Failure rates continue to decline during this
period also. Generally, the rate for major defect during this period drops to less than 0.1%, and if this rate is exceeded by a
substantial margin, one must look for a fault in the circuit design, assembly procedure, or the device itself. Unless the problem is
found and corrected, frequent field failures will be the likely result. In most cases, the field failure rate can be correlated to major
defect during this period, so this is an important aspect of device reliability.
Upon transferring the equipment to field service, the stress level is reduced further, with a corresponding drop in failure rates.
Failure rates normally range from several FIT to several hundred FIT during this period.
On the other hand, the user must design greater margins. For example, diodes and thyristors should be operated at 50 ~ 60% of
their maximum voltage ratings or lesser, and junction temperatures should not exceed 70 ~ 80% of maximum rating. It is also
important to remember that a device must be in working harmony with other components in the circuit for maximum reliability
standards can be assured.
When designing a piece of equipment for reliable service, device selection must be considered from a standpoint of performance,
reliability, and economy. Since it is not easy to achieve high performance/reliability and economy at the same time, a balance must
be struck on the side of practical value. In other words, device selection should be based on the user’s expectations for the
machine he is designing.
Fig.7.1 Failure Rate Versus Time
Fig.7.2 Semiconductor Device Failure Rate Versus Time
E
a
rl
y
F
a
il
u
r
e
R
m F
il
r
Wearout Failure
Tim
e
Time
O-A-B-C Initial Failure (Factory)
C-D Early Failure (Field)
D-E Random Failure (Field)
E-F Wearout (Field)
(0-A-B-C-D Debugging Period)
Failure Rate
Failure Rate
Page view 9
1 2 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 42 43

Comments to this Manuals

No comments